RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
March 27, 2013 at 7:23 am
(This post was last modified: March 27, 2013 at 7:35 am by ciko83.)
Quote:Dude, don't just post a link like that without warning! I can't handle the level of ignorance in there without preparation!
prove me wrong if you can.
Quote:So let me ask my question again: have you even spent a single minute researching the science behind this stuff?
i have studied science enough to make my own judgments what i beleive and what i cant beleive.
Quote:It'd take way, way too long to go down the line and debunk each of the claims you linked to in turn, but the fact is, I could do it.
let try with this one
How could non-thining nature create natural engine with 40 parts joined on correct places? how could nature put these parts like puzzles on correct places, logically inteklectual being iis that who think like that?
What is the evolutionary mechanism wich gives instructions to different parts of the natural engine so they connect on correct places so the engine could work properlly?
Quote:For example, what if there's just no god? Ever even consider that? What if the science we have now shows us what happened- real science by the way, not your misunderstanding of science- and you're just talking a whole bunch of nothing? Stop just assuming that your god exists and going from there, that's the definition of illogical.
yes i have consider that, but that would be illogical for me to believe, why beacuse all this nature cooparateing with eachother and why we are here would be illogical, why are we here on earth then, what is our purpose? no answer from atheists.
but when i attach God to this, then stuff becomes clear and logical.
Quote:Stop just assuming that your god exists and going from there, that's the definition of illogical
let say, that God does not exists, shall we
and then we study nature and find out this
then we ask our selves, how could nature put all those parts on correct places, or how could this natural engine create itself it would be the same question as Can you mother give birth to herself. totally illogical
but then you say DNA, but how could DNA do it?
imagine DNA(machine)
so machine(DNA) created car(natural engine) in the factory(nature) without God/Engeener, is this logical???
Atheistic half truth
>>>>>>Machine in the factory created the car<<<<<<
it is logical, only 50%, beacuse yes that is truth that
machine(DNA) created car(natural engine) in the factory(nature) but they forgot to connect it to God/Engeener
without God/engener it is illogical. Athestic belief system is very weak if you know real arguments
Religous 100% truth
>>>>>>Engeners designed and created the car with machine in the factory<<<<<<
as you can see science leads towards God, but it ios you who dont want to admit that.
Quote:So because your single, biased source says that he's real, he's therefore real? That's incredibly fallacious. Not even worth rebutting, really: you know there are even older books than the quran which claim their god is the one that created the universe. Why are they wrong but you're right?
but science agrees with this bias source, so what can yyou do about it ??
Quote:you know there are even older books than the quran which claim their god is the one that created the universe
but God informed us in quran that he sent books to people before quran, so nothing strange that other books claim that God created universe. and by the way those older books were changed and corrupted , just like bible is.
Quote:Do me a favor: point one out. Show me an organism that's like that, and I will go out and find you its evolutionary antecedents. I promise. Give me something to work with, and watch me go.
here