RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
March 27, 2013 at 9:00 am
(This post was last modified: March 27, 2013 at 9:06 am by ciko83.)
(March 27, 2013 at 8:51 am)paulpablo Wrote: You're arguing for irreducible complexity, I don't know about the actual complexity of the flagellum motor and i doubt you're an expert in biology either, but the case your making was proven wrong in a court a long long time ago, but like I said if you have proof that says evolution is definitely not true because you have evidence of irreducible complexity your talents are wasted here my friend, you should be giving this evidence to biologists and the nature experts who dedicate their life to studying nature and biology and do believe in evolution.
that delusion, nothing has been debunked
If it is reducible, then it was created like that
let me clearfy this to you
natural engine with rotating propellers, left
natural engine with, different parts on correct places
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP(rotating propellers)
virus flagellum(without rotating propellers, right
ABCD(without rotating rotating propellers)
if God meant to create it in the first beging like this
ABCD(without rotating rotating propellers)
and he choosed to create natural engine with, different parts on correct places ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP(rotating propellers)
if i chose to create bmw engine (connect it to natural engine with rotating proepllers)
another type of engine (connect it to natural co called engine without rotating proepllers)
and then atheist come to me and say, look it is reducible, but nobody said that this little evolved to the bigger BMW engine above, beacuse they were created spearate and have different purposes.
same it is with virus flagellum and bacteriell and spermcells flagellum.