(April 2, 2013 at 12:20 am)Rhythm Wrote: That's their claim, but until a court upholds it, it's just the "claimants" position.....if this shit didn't need to be explained to you you'd make fewer missteps in this sort of discussion. A more accurate description of their position would be "we feel that it -should be- unlawful"...but in arguments over legality, this is pretty much assumed....and in an article about an argument -over- legality, strict adherence to the terms takes a backseat to getting out a narrative - connecting with the reader.
Hearts and minds, hearts and minds.
RE sex and discussion, during, during..lol.
The courts have already upheld it, but I guess you thought I'd bring up a point without knowing it's validity and/or didn't even bother to do a search for yourself or follow the pre-formed search that I posted.
