(April 5, 2013 at 1:15 am)radorth Wrote:(April 4, 2013 at 8:25 am)Faith No More Wrote: No, it is not implicit. They could believe they are telling the truth but still be wrong. If you think determining they are not liars(how you would do that, I don't know) is sufficient proof, you need to look up the words "sufficient" and "proof" before throwing them around again.
So they thought they saw a man's limb grow out, crazy and blind people instantly cured, Lazareth raised, and were simply mistaken?
Right. Sorry, they either saw it or they were liars and you well know there is no choice as you claim, if you have the powers of reason you claim.
Correction, they thought they heard someone say they saw those things happen. Your cherished NT Gospels aren't witness accounts. Never forget that.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
