Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 23, 2025, 4:09 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
#5
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:

Long debunked? Where was I? I believe what you should have said was "unproven".
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote:

Which is just a facet of normal evolutionary theory.
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: after the first living organism developed from nonliving matter in the ocean and formed into a "primordial soup," it resulted in a "common ancestor" from which came all the different forms of life that have ever existed on planet earth, including humans. All of this is believed to have been accomplished by itself (abiogenesis), without input from a supernatural God aka Jehovah who intervened and guided the outcome. Non-living matter simply decided one day to come to life--by itself--and bring forth intelligent life by unintelligent means. (Sources: (1) LIFE--How Did It Get Here? By Evolution or by Creation? Pages 10-11; (2) Encyclopedia Britannica (1978), page 1018)
Decided? How can inanimate matter make a decision? If you knew more about abiogenesis, you probably wouldn't have worded it that way. Also, ideas about how abiogenesis works may have advanced since 1978.
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote:


Even if a god existed and was responsible for the creation of a common ancestor, that wouldn't provide any evidence against evolution.
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote:

Apparently actual scientists disagree with you as to what is scientifically credible. You might want to read this.
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: They routinely use fabricated words such as
Aren't all words fabricated?
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: "species transition", "speciation", "Punctuated Equilibrium", etc. to mislead the gullible. I might add that many pro-evolution scientists are determined to make names for themselves and will resort to outright dishonesty when necessary. I will present proof of this later on in this thread.
Do you know what those words mean?
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: Regarding the credibility of the Genesis creation account vs. evolution theory, one source states: "But in fairness, it could also be asked: Is evolution itself truly scientific? On the other hand, is Genesis just another ancient creation myth, as many contend? Or is it in harmony with the discoveries of modern science?" (Source: LIFE--How Did It Get Here? By Evolution or by Creation? Pages 10-11)
If god created all species that have ever existed at the same time then Noah must have been really scrunched on his ark...
Genetic evidence strongly rejects the idea that the human population was ever two.

(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: FACTS TO CONSIDER:
FACT #1: Just like Charles Darwin, the modern-day evolution scientific community asserts that every single animal that has ever existed came from one common ancestor aka came from a single organism (macroevolution).


FACT #2: There is no evidence in the fossils (bones of long-dead animals) proving that humans or animals evolved from completely different beings than what they presently are (macroevolution).
That's why scientists don't rely exclusively on the fossil record. There is a lot of genetic evidence supporting evolution.



(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: FACT #3: Atheists have no credible explanation for how the "common ancestor" came to life by itself
We don't?
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: (abiogenesis) so that evolution could then supposedly proceed.
There you go. You should have said "proven".
(April 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: So their routine is to attempt to bypass that critical step by claiming evolution has nothing to do with how the "common ancestor" came to life. If they show up in this thread, you will see them doing what amounts to the usual song and dance along that line.
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth - by Darkstar - April 6, 2013 at 9:46 pm
Speaking of the god of the gaps - by A_Nony_Mouse - April 25, 2013 at 7:40 pm
RE: Speaking of the god of the gaps - by pocaracas - April 25, 2013 at 7:42 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Darwin's Voyage on the Beagle, droll dramatization Alex K 2 1068 September 17, 2016 at 9:45 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false Rob216 206 54922 November 10, 2014 at 2:02 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Darwin Proven Wrong? sswhateverlove 165 33628 September 15, 2014 at 2:57 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  My essay on evolution vs creation. Yahweh 11 4716 February 25, 2014 at 11:05 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Have you ever actually gone to "Answers in Genesis.com?" Boris Karloff 13 4021 February 9, 2014 at 4:41 pm
Last Post: Rampant.A.I.
  Did Darwin get it wrong? Zone 20 5757 September 19, 2013 at 9:58 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Researchers debunk myth of 'right-brain' and 'left-brain' personality traits CleanShavenJesus 11 6545 August 18, 2013 at 7:12 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Darwin Day KichigaiNeko 2 1744 February 8, 2013 at 8:25 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko
  Evolution V Creation Zen Badger 168 75520 January 20, 2013 at 5:42 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Need some help refuting this creation argument... DaveSumm 25 11522 January 12, 2013 at 7:16 am
Last Post: Aractus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)