Show me your proof

[A_Nony_Mouse]

Omni has a defined meaning. Present has a defined meaning. Just because one can write omnipresent does not mean it has a defined meaning. One can give concrete example of things which are described by omni and present. That does not mean there exists something which can be described as omnipresent. Similarly one can say they have a square circle. It is fun game to play with children to get them to think. So are terms like omnipresent but we learn believers truly are like children and cannot see the problem.

I see it perfectly. Rhythm admitted it means whatever he wants it too mean, which is absurd.

You guys are not addressing whether a a God in one million more places than you are at any moment, or who knows one million times as much as Einstein is worthy of worship. I'd be perfectly happy with him.

I thought the first was obvious. Every radio and TV station has signals in billions of times more places than I am. I do not worship radio transmissions.

As to knowledge, that is fact not in evidence. I do not deal with hypotheticals.

As to worship beyond getting together for a group sing along I know of no functional meaning of it beyond filling the collection plate so, no, priests do not deserve the money.

As to your beliefs in smart radio waves that line the pockets of priests you will have to answer that yourself.

Neither will atheists answer whether they would serve Jesus if he came back and healed 94% of all the terminally ill people in the entire world.

Again a hypothetical. In practice your Jesus is over 1900 years late in returning as he promised (without crossing his fingers behind his back) so in the real world the question goes to you as to your continued interest in the person.

BTW: Is there a 6% you are pissed at? Why do you believe he would have to return to do the healing? Will he restore amputees this time around?

Or, if they are intelligent and brave enough to answer, the answer is no because he's not powerful enough, I assume. (They don't say)

What kind of fool worships (i.e., pays priests) power?

What kind of "being" wants to be worshiped? (Using the same definition of worship. A rational being would get rid of the middle men as this hypothetical god of yours needs nothing.)

Demanding God is either omnipowerful or he is not presents a false dichotomy. Billions of people would love to see the Jesus I described return to earth whether he met some vague "omnipotent" standard or not.

What makes you BELIEVE atheists are demanding any but physical evidence while rejecting your imaging impossible things? You have no physical evidence so what is your point?

So it isn't me who doesn't get it. It's mindless unbelievers who don't think, don't know anything about logic, and see only in black and white, just like the "fundies" they criticize.

Produce physical evidence instead of asking about worshiping a square circle (for whatever reason) and we will have something specific to discuss. There really is no point in talking about squared circles.

Hint: You either did not get it or you are ignoring it and running on without addressing you obviously squared circles.