I believe the fatal error lies with in the fact these objective morals God puts in place are the best. Since we cannot be God we cannot judge his motives. God if a perfect being or atleast superior intelligence, we cannot judge his motives. Reason being how do we know he is not being manipulative or even is what it claims it is. Basically in theory we need to judge based on our reality what is objectively good. Which usually defaults to what benefits mankind as a collective and pushes positive forward progress.
Since this being is not really interactive, at least to a relatable sense. A Christian, or any theist in general really is making a logical leap to assume what is said by said being is true. Which is why it is a slippery slope regarding the moral perfection of god. Also, I find it interesting that theists trust said being so highly when the bar of moral perfection in reality is not really able to be seen. In short, how can a blind man tell another blind man what something looks like.
Since this being is not really interactive, at least to a relatable sense. A Christian, or any theist in general really is making a logical leap to assume what is said by said being is true. Which is why it is a slippery slope regarding the moral perfection of god. Also, I find it interesting that theists trust said being so highly when the bar of moral perfection in reality is not really able to be seen. In short, how can a blind man tell another blind man what something looks like.
![[Image: grumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-_GaCN-f8ZFo%2FUNfmimTyf4I%2FAAAAAAAANmk%2FoakT_wL319U%2Fs1600%2Fgrumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg)
I would be a televangelist....but I have too much of a soul.
