I'll do a proof. Nobody better steal it, cause I made it up all my self. And since I made it up all myself, it probably wont work well, if at all.
"Cause and effect" doesn't actually exist as some ethereal governing principle, but nevertheless is what we perceive when examining the world. Theoretically, if matter or electromagnetic forces acted differently, we would get different effects from causes. Our universe is quantitatively coherent, or, more scientifically termed, we have a conservation of mass/energy. However, this law is the same "cause and effect" thing, just expressed differently. Conservation is not some ethereal governing principle, but it is simply how the universe operates. But, there could be universe X where energy was able to be created. If friction worked in the opposite, energy would constantly be created. Or, universe X could randomly create mass. Or Hershey bars. Or bunnies. Or all sorts of different things. In fact, if we imagine a lack of cause and effect to a universe, there is an infinite possibility for what the effect might be for any given cause. That's actually what I want to do here: don't use the presuppositions the universe gives us naturally, but instead think of possibilities without the regular limits.
The possibility of effect is not based on cause, so we can say it is baseless or random.
Random is not restricted, so the effect has an endless or infinite amount of possibilities.
Out of the infinite possibility for chaotic universes, there is only one possibility for our ordered universe.
Our universe is impossible to exist. lim(x->∞) 1/x = 0
The universe shouldn't make sense. We should have bunnies poofing into existence all over the place while gravity sporadically turns on and off. Instead, we have order. Therefore, I argue design.
"Cause and effect" doesn't actually exist as some ethereal governing principle, but nevertheless is what we perceive when examining the world. Theoretically, if matter or electromagnetic forces acted differently, we would get different effects from causes. Our universe is quantitatively coherent, or, more scientifically termed, we have a conservation of mass/energy. However, this law is the same "cause and effect" thing, just expressed differently. Conservation is not some ethereal governing principle, but it is simply how the universe operates. But, there could be universe X where energy was able to be created. If friction worked in the opposite, energy would constantly be created. Or, universe X could randomly create mass. Or Hershey bars. Or bunnies. Or all sorts of different things. In fact, if we imagine a lack of cause and effect to a universe, there is an infinite possibility for what the effect might be for any given cause. That's actually what I want to do here: don't use the presuppositions the universe gives us naturally, but instead think of possibilities without the regular limits.
The possibility of effect is not based on cause, so we can say it is baseless or random.
Random is not restricted, so the effect has an endless or infinite amount of possibilities.
Out of the infinite possibility for chaotic universes, there is only one possibility for our ordered universe.
Our universe is impossible to exist. lim(x->∞) 1/x = 0
The universe shouldn't make sense. We should have bunnies poofing into existence all over the place while gravity sporadically turns on and off. Instead, we have order. Therefore, I argue design.
The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace.
