On Non-belief

[Tex]

no, silly.... I'm simply not assuming a god and using your rationalization to conjecture as to how you could have been pulled into believing the story.

There are different types of rationalization? Maybe rationalization is just relative. Everyone can have their own logic and it all makes sense, right?

That is NOT an assumption - rationality DOES say that a "god" as defined by the xtian religion - does not exist.

THERE is simply no possibility that a single being - even with multiple personality disorder - could fulfill ALL of the claims made for the god in the religion - much less the bible alone.

THere are simply too many contradictions and conflicting claims that make the xtian god irrational - as it has always been.

You are so very assertive of your claims. Based on the capital letters and the intentional avoidance of the name "Christ" while simultaneously spelling "god" out rather than hyphenating it*, I'm sure your backing for those claims have very little emotional motivation. I would love to hear your logical reasoning for why Christianity is irrational, why God cannot fulfill some of the claims made, and all those totally valid contradictions that don't have a one sentence explanation.

*Means you're not Jewish

And hey, here's a secret:

---

"Xtian" is actually a valid abbreviation of "Christian" because "chi", or "X" in Greek is the first letter of Χριστὸς, which means "Christ". It's not even slightly disrespectful.

---