Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 5, 2025, 7:14 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So much for "intelligent design"
#23
Re: RE: So much for "intelligent design"
(April 21, 2013 at 5:38 pm)Minimalist Wrote: To be fair they also kill a fair number of women....for various reasons.


None of which seem very compelling.

But this happens in observed chimps and baboons too. Once the alpha male claim his territory and have gotten rid of the competition, he also goes into punish mode of any female who does not fall in line with his rule. That is usually the only reason, if not then, most of the time females are hurt.

While I'm at it. This is more reason for the theist to except evolution. Their own behavior toward their fellow men is more then enough proof that we are just another species of animal amongst the rest inhabitant this planet and not from a perfect creation.

(April 21, 2013 at 5:41 pm)Rhythm Wrote:
(April 21, 2013 at 5:34 pm)frz Wrote: Women outnumber men mostly because men are so violent and they enjoy killing each other.
Just to nitpick, that's not even remotely close to why a population might trend towards being slightly female heavy. It's actually a very well understood phenomena, so well understood - that there's a successful formula for it..lol.

Sure there are a couple more subtle reasons but, the simpler , most basic ones are enough.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 6:48 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:01 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:03 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:04 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:06 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 7:07 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Brian37 - April 2, 2013 at 7:08 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by KichigaiNeko - April 2, 2013 at 7:09 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 8:07 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by pocaracas - April 2, 2013 at 9:03 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 9:06 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 9:23 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Joel - April 2, 2013 at 9:24 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by MysticKnight - April 2, 2013 at 9:25 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Jackalope - April 21, 2013 at 7:41 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by bladevalant546 - April 21, 2013 at 8:02 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Anomalocaris - April 21, 2013 at 2:52 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 3:10 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Anomalocaris - April 21, 2013 at 3:22 pm
Re: So much for "intelligent design" - by frz - April 21, 2013 at 5:34 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 5:38 pm
Re: RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by frz - April 21, 2013 at 7:44 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 7:55 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Tonus - April 21, 2013 at 9:19 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 21, 2013 at 9:47 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 21, 2013 at 10:59 pm
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 22, 2013 at 1:47 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Fruity - April 22, 2013 at 12:21 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by bladevalant546 - April 22, 2013 at 12:35 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Fruity - April 22, 2013 at 12:41 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 22, 2013 at 2:53 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 22, 2013 at 3:12 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Justtristo - April 22, 2013 at 3:50 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Aractus - April 23, 2013 at 4:16 am
RE: So much for "intelligent design" - by Minimalist - April 22, 2013 at 3:36 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Design Is Pseudoscience: Creationist Lies About Evolution Debunked CodeDNA 7 1335 April 22, 2023 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: no one
  Blind evolution or intelligent design? ignoramus 12 2476 August 2, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  How much did we pay for this? brewer 3 902 December 14, 2016 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Carthaginian DNA - Not So Much Of A Surprise. Minimalist 0 1444 May 26, 2016 at 12:48 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion? Rhondazvous 47 10109 October 25, 2015 at 8:40 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Directionality in evolution without intelligent guidance tantric 25 6046 January 22, 2015 at 6:19 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Primordial earth much more hospitable to life than imagined. Anomalocaris 0 1050 September 17, 2014 at 10:31 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Intelligent Design: Irreducible Complexity? OfficerVajardian 49 14362 August 17, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Intelligent Design triumph! Mudhammam 2 1408 July 17, 2014 at 7:05 am
Last Post: FreeTony
  Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts Muslim Scholar 57 25288 October 30, 2013 at 9:45 am
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)