Rosenberg's Argument Against Beliefs

[Neo-Scholastic]

Apo, your contribution to the subject warrants a more thoughtful response, so first I'd like to do a little housekeeping.

It is fact that nothing which is not a physical process has been found. That is not a prejudice. That is a fact...Only physical evidence matters. After you have established physical evidence you can argue the physical evidence.

Physicalism is the so-called fact that is under consideration, since mental processes and properties do not fit neatly into the laws of physics. Our understanding of the physical universe rests upon the foundation of philosophy. Your idea that only physical evidence counts as evidence is a self imposed limitation.