RE: Are you for or against the separation of church and state?
April 22, 2013 at 8:07 pm
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2013 at 8:11 pm by Ryantology.)
(April 22, 2013 at 12:59 pm)Godschild Wrote: You say you do not want God to save you and the rest of those who aren't saved probably feel the same. So why should He force you to live in eternity with Him if that's not your desire or anyone else for that matter. You said He should save those who do not desire it, so why did you change your mind.
Here's the problem I think most of us have with it.
If it was just a matter of getting sweet heavenly rewards for getting on the Yahweh bandwagon, if it was nothing but a positive incentive, who would care? I don't want those rewards, they do not appeal to me in the slightest. So, when I die, I just want to die. If you leave me to do that, then that's okay.
The problem is that God sees fit to punish us for not jumping on the bandwagon. It is not enough for him to just let us non-believers experience oblivion. Salvation is not a positive incentive, because what are we being saved from? An eternity of pain and misery in hell. I recognize no authority which considers this acceptable, because no crime, no collection of crimes, no lifetime aggregation of crimes, deserves eternal punishment, and it's worse still when you consider that the almighty and omnipotent God does not define sin as things which are negative or detrimental or harmful or dangerous. Some sins have these qualities, but a lot don't, and God doesn't care either way. God doesn't care about the murder victim, he cares about being the victim himself, because he presumes to think that any crime committed is a crime against himself. That's insane and stupid. If someone shoots me, or my kid, I couldn't give a fuck less what God thinks about it (especially when he is directly responsible for it happening).
If I'm wrong about everything and end up in hell, I'm okay with that. I live my life for myself, my loved ones, my friends, and for whatever I can contribute to humanity as a whole. I would not live my life for a being as monstrous and hateful as your god, and if he sends me to hell, he still can't rob me of the satisfaction that I have lived a happy, fulfilling life as an independent person, and I can take solace in the fact that the company will be much more interesting.
Quote:Please show me the endless excuses Christians use for God not presenting Himself to man in a way everyone can know He's real.
You have a knack for issuing challenges which are insultingly easy to overcome. I found these on the internet, within about 20 minute's time.
The idea that if God to reveal himself, physically, to the world, my free will to choose to love him would be erased, is illogical. I do not love my mother and father because they are my mother and father. I do not love them because I know they physically exist. I love them because they have demonstrated, physically and emotionally, that they loved me and cared for me. They were the ones changing my diapers, feeding me, giving me advice and support. They were the ones teaching me. They are the reason I am the man I am today, for better or worse. That is why I love my parents. If they were bad people, if they hurt me, belittled me, the fact that they are my parents, the fact that they physically exist, would be irrelevant.
If God appeared to the world, I would be forced to accept the fact that he exists. That is it. Whether or not I would pursue the sort of personal relationship Christians insist God wants would depend not on God's existence at this point, it would depend on what he does. Would thousands of children still starve to death every day? Would thousands die in agony? Would people die in random accidents? Would a select few have far more than they need while the vast majority has too little? Then, I would choose to spurn the God who allows it all to happen.
So far, all the 'evidence' we have for God's existence is a holy book no different from any of a thousand other holy books. Unless I go out of my way to pretend otherwise, it depicts God as a distinctly negative force, the enemy and tormentor of the humans he created, an injust and capricious tyrant who cares only about himself. I can't love my brother because I don't have a brother. If someone insists that I do, I won't believe it until solid evidence is presented. And, even if he is real, if his personality resembles God's, I could never love him.
If God was real and it was obvious, the practice of apologetics would not be necessary. Like everything Godschild ever says, apologetics is nothing but lies and horse shit. I need no apologetics. I don't need fifty different justifications. I need only state the obvious: what does not exist cannot show itself.