We do indeed have a great difference of opinion about qualia and there is no need to beat a dead horse. Mentioning it was unavoidable in reply to your post. We both agree that Rosenberg's syllogism is invalid, but for different reasons.
Apophenia, I recognize that you have no obligation to respond to my post. Whether you are bored, annoyed, or cannot be bothered is beside the point, but I would have preferred that you bowed out of the discussion more gracefully.
As for me this is my last post on this thread. Take care.
Apophenia, I recognize that you have no obligation to respond to my post. Whether you are bored, annoyed, or cannot be bothered is beside the point, but I would have preferred that you bowed out of the discussion more gracefully.
As for me this is my last post on this thread. Take care.