(April 25, 2013 at 1:54 am)bladevalant546 Wrote: When i spoke of unity is more unity in vision not in philosophy. Basically we all should be unified in forward progression and improving our technology, social structure, and knowledge. Forget monetary profit and other pointless destructive things.
Monetary profit is a reason for some to invest in progression, 'pointlessly destructive things' like war advance progression.
Unification is of one mind... it's suffers from a lack of diversity. While one technology might go 'forward' quickly with a unified vision: all of the various technologies that would be produced in the hodge-podge we have today would no longer be developed (anywhere near so quickly).
I'm against unity (the becoming of one unit), because I'm aware of the strength of diversified unit[s]. If one unit would be destroyed handily by an external force, a different unit might well survive that same assault.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
