(May 3, 2013 at 4:14 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(May 3, 2013 at 4:01 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: I'll mark you with an F for not noticing that Wooters:
1. Misrepresents atheism
2. Makes unsupported assertions
3. Bases faulty conclusion on unsupported assertions
4. Fills in a gap in knowledge with a 'transcendent order'
1. No he didn't. He specified an aspect of atheism. You read something into his words that wasn't there.
2. He pretty much laid it all out for you. Statement: here's an egg. You: no there isn't.
Not much of a response huh.
3. Granted, you can't address something that you don't understand. The assertion remains unchallenged, unless you can prove your counter assertion, which you yet haven't. Therefore, we have one hypothesis minus challenge this far.
4. You're proving his point here.
There is no different aspect of atheism. It's a lack of a belief in god, end of story end of question.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
