Definition of and evidence for the holocaust

[A_Nony_Mouse]

Sorry, I think I'll pass. There's only so much time in one's life that one has to be choosy about what one spends time on. Frankly, your reputation precedes you.

That is a VERY VERY LAME excuse for not posting any physical evidence for your belief in the holy holocaust.

---

Sorry, I think I'll pass. There's only so much time in one's life that one has to be choosy about what one spends time on. Frankly, your reputation precedes you.

Frankly, I feel much better regarding not engaging his obvious ignorance any further than that one response.

As you have no evidence you can present and defend how does my ignorance compare with yours?

How about a chorus of "I'm not gonna tell you" in sing song?

---

so let's cut down the filler why do you want too kill all the jews?

Why do you care about any religion if you are an atheist? No different from the Druids.

Who mourns Adonis?

---

You would think with all those mountains of evidence they could find at least one thing.

Apparently you simply dismiss anything which does not meet your pre-determined outcome. Careful. You don't want to resemble theists.

Would you care to point out physical evidence which has been posted which does in fact support the Darkstar thesis? I have not noticed any.

My uncle served in the 11th Armored Division. They liberated Matthausen in Austria. He said he could never forget the smell. I suppose you think that the Schweinsbraten was rotting because the power went out?

That there were camps was never in question. That the very idea of camps sucks whether run by the Germans or the Americans in that war. But if that is your definition of holocaust then there was one. However that is not what most people want as the definition.

As to power going out, the Allies did claim to have done that during "liberation" and to have cut off all food and water supplies. One has to wonder how anyone survived.

Mauthausen is not considered an extermination camp but the definition these people seem to want is attempted extermination so that camp does not count for their holocaust.

KEEP the definitions and meanings straight.

One does not accept what people claim is evidence. One evaluates the evidence presented.

An intercepted radio transmission, sent without encryption, and incomplete which does not mention killing anyone or mention Jews and mentions three camps never accused of exterminating anyone is clearly not evidence of anything they will accept as holocaustic.

PS if someone can introduce a list that does not say either Jews or deaths and imply it supports their holocaustic beliefs can I introduce this one?



That explains why Mauthausan stank. There were more dead there than at Auschwitz. But do not believe me. Believe the Red Cross. So much for Auschwitz.