RE: Definition of and evidence for the holocaust
May 9, 2013 at 11:41 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2013 at 11:44 pm by A_Nony_Mouse.)
(May 9, 2013 at 1:55 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Sorry, I think I'll pass. There's only so much time in one's life that one has to be choosy about what one spends time on. Frankly, your reputation precedes you.
Yes it does. And all because a bunch of nizkooks spent who knows how many hours forging posts they attributed to me. I would thank them except they started phoning my son with death threats. You know how holohuggers are.
(May 9, 2013 at 2:08 am)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:You would think with all those mountains of evidence they could find at least one thing.
Apparently you simply dismiss anything which does not meet your pre-determined outcome. Careful. You don't want to resemble theists.
I have conditioned acceptance upon physical evidence. I have proposed NOTHING to be believed without physical evidence. We keep trying to explain the difference between belief and evidence to theists. I do not obscure that difference.
Quote:My uncle served in the 11th Armored Division. They liberated Matthausen in Austria. He said he could never forget the smell. I suppose you think that the Schweinsbraten was rotting because the power went out?
Again more died there than at Auschwitz but no cause of death and no religion given.
