RE: Definition of and evidence for the holocaust
May 11, 2013 at 7:29 pm
(This post was last modified: May 11, 2013 at 7:29 pm by catfish.)
(May 11, 2013 at 7:06 pm)A_Nony_Mouse Wrote:(May 11, 2013 at 6:43 pm)catfish Wrote: C'mon gramps. You have yet to address my challenge when you claimed to be not a nice person.
So???? Are you basing your judgement of stupidity on a stupidity test that you may or may not have passed?
Actually I am finding this interesting. No one appears to know what this holocaust thing is but they are absolutely certain there are mountains of evidence in support of they don't know what.
You? You just want to bicker. A frightful waste of bandwidth. At least when I wish to remind someone of something they have not done I have the courtesy to repeat what was not done. But no, just attempts to bicker. If I want bickering I can visit my first wife.
Unless I misunderstood a short exchange with the moderators on another matter posting without addition comment is frowned upon. The believers have done almost nothing but that in this thread. Perhaps I misunderstood. Perhaps they have been advised and that is why they have chosen to remain silent. I have no idea.
More fluff, defelection and denial. Predictable Bob is predictable.
Me bicker? I'd hardly call me pointing out your flaws bickering. I state your error, you spew forth foaming fluff (the expanding kind).
What is the definition of "allocution"? Do you maintain that you used that word correctly?