Definition of and evidence for the holocaust

[catfish]

Perhaps I used it in error. I used in the sense it is used in US procedurals. It hardly matters correct or not as I spelled out what I meant by it.

Pretending that makes a difference to the thread is also bickering.

Perhaps?
Dude, I pointed out that mistake several times only to have you insist on using it for your definition of acceptable evidence.

You set the standards and later denied them by refusing to admit that a confession is sufficient evidence (you can't deny the confession(s) and the documentary evidence combined).

You want a definition for the holohuggers?

"The attempted or realised mass murder of non-combatants during a time of war"

Of course I expect more fluff, deflection and denial, 'cause you're predictable Bob after all.
.