Definition of and evidence for the holocaust

[A_Nony_Mouse]

I set the standard are more than merely I did it but as a convincing recitation of the nature and manner of the crime. It is much simpler than going through crap like Commandant of Auschwitz and pointing out the book is not traceable to the purported author.

You set the standard as "acceptable by US court standards" or something similar. Your opinion as to what is a "convincing recitation" does not matter at this point.

Far from it but then I have to ask why all this talk about Jews if it had nothing in particular to do with Jews? Based upon the evidence you will provide how mass is mass? The US has had several people described as mass murders in the last 50 years or so. I have heard of 9/11 described as mass murder but that was only of some 3000 people. So you will have to produce evidence of a significant number. I mean 3000 out of the quasi-official 44 million dead for WWII is well down in the noise. It is about 5% of the number of civilians murdered at Dresden. Even the 60,000 or so Palestinians murdered in 1948 is about the same as Dresden and no one finds either significant.

Please feel free to modify your definition and produce evidence for a number of interest. Now I agree one murder is an bad as a million as the perp can only hang once so it does have to be something significant.

Deflection? Really?

Do you accept that definition or not? Shall we take a poll to determine it's validity?
.

I thought reference to Dresden was conceding 57,000 civilians were murdered during WWII. If that was not clear. Yes WE AGREE that 57,000 civilians were murdered and that that is properly described as mass murder.

What is your problem?

---

so where did the lamps made from human skin and all the other lovely artpeices the nazis designed for fun... come from?

Good EFing question. Care to post the forensic analysis of whatever all that stuff is supposed to be? There had to have been forensic analyses to establish the fact. As I have no idea how to establish either religion or cause of death from skin samples I am very interested in how it was done. Please post the appropriate links.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/fea...-skin.html

Amusing story but if falls short of the requisite evidence of cause of death and religion -- if you are defining it as religion matters to whatever definition you propose.

But if you are saying a few objects of human skin is all this holy holocaust thing is all about I must say it is hardly worth all the crap surrounding it. Gruesome perhaps even demented but a handful of objects from one camp seems hardly noteworthy.