RE: Definition of and evidence for the holocaust
May 12, 2013 at 12:49 am
(This post was last modified: May 12, 2013 at 12:57 am by A_Nony_Mouse.)
(May 11, 2013 at 11:33 pm)cratehorus Wrote: ...and who are these swell looking chums?
Damned if I know. Might be from the Gulags or from Japanese prisoner camps from the Pacific if it traces to war time. No indications of religion unless they pull up the tunics. Care to produce traceable evidence as to who they are?
(May 11, 2013 at 11:27 pm)catfish Wrote: Your tactics are transparent as Hades man.
Holocaust = "The attempted or realised mass murder of non-combatants during a time of war"
You have your definition as you refuse to deny that definition I supplied. Whatever Yad Vashem thinks is irrelevant as the question I asked was directed at you.
This is your last chance to deny that definition before the nazi hunters find you... lol
.
I will hold you to your word that will now shut up.
(May 11, 2013 at 11:49 pm)Darkstar Wrote:(May 11, 2013 at 11:33 pm)cratehorus Wrote: ...and who are these swell looking chums?
Well, they look swell compared to these guys:
I do not recognize the one on the left. The one on the right is attributed to Bergen-Belsen showing a mass burial of those who died of typhoid some ten days after liberation. I do not see a religion or cause of death in either of them.
During the Nuremberg trials an atrocity film was shown of Nazi officials burning hundreds of bodies. The accused broke out laughing. How could they!!! Turns out it was the cremation of those who died in the Dresden bombing. It was not usual to accuse the Germans of Allied atrocities.
Any rational person is skeptical of implications without evidence.