RE: Why I am a Gnostic Atheist
May 12, 2013 at 3:07 am
(This post was last modified: May 12, 2013 at 3:11 am by Faith Is Glorified Delusion.)
(May 12, 2013 at 2:55 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: Right. So that's your definition (or at least the definition you're working with) of what a god is. It's still supernatural, by your own definition, therefore my point still stands that it's intellectually dishonest and impossible to be "gnostic" about anything supernatural.
No it is not my definition. I do not depict gods as supernatural agents - theists do. They define their gods as supernatural agents. Since there is no supernatural, therefore there are no gods. That's my position.
(May 12, 2013 at 3:01 am)Minimalist Wrote: It is not up to you to demonstrate that gods do not exist. The proponents of such bullshit bear the responsibility to demonstrate - by real evidence not pious prattle - that THEIR god exists.
Simply tell them that you see no evidence whatsoever for any gods and then sit back and laugh while they proceed to pull stuff out of their asses.
Exactly.
