You guys are all idiots. You're arguing with someone who, essentially, believes that the moon landings were a hoax and a conspiracy and therefore all the "evidence" is really the work of those behind the conspiracy!
You give him pictures, and he says "those are of something else, nana-nana", so what? You show pictures in a court of law, they are what they are, it's up to the other side to disprove your evidence once it has been lodged, not up to you to prove the identity of everybody in the picture.
For there to be a genuine chance of there being a conspiracy you have to bring evidence that one exists. You have to show that it is possible that a conspiracy may exist, and you have to be able to show that the evidence does not fit the official version of events. Once the conspiracy theorist dismisses evidence he doesn't like, you know he's living in lala land. There's simply no excusing it; nobody dismisses evidence before it can be proved that the evidence itself is bad, or without good reason to believe it so.
You give him pictures, and he says "those are of something else, nana-nana", so what? You show pictures in a court of law, they are what they are, it's up to the other side to disprove your evidence once it has been lodged, not up to you to prove the identity of everybody in the picture.
For there to be a genuine chance of there being a conspiracy you have to bring evidence that one exists. You have to show that it is possible that a conspiracy may exist, and you have to be able to show that the evidence does not fit the official version of events. Once the conspiracy theorist dismisses evidence he doesn't like, you know he's living in lala land. There's simply no excusing it; nobody dismisses evidence before it can be proved that the evidence itself is bad, or without good reason to believe it so.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
