RE: I don't believe theists and reject their claims of theism.
May 13, 2013 at 7:06 pm
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2013 at 7:24 pm by The Reality Salesman01.)
(May 13, 2013 at 7:01 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You make the mistake of calling what is natural yet undiscovered 'supernatural'. You then compound this by attributing God to these gaps. Yes it's OK to not know. For a while there I thought you we're supporting theology. Because it is from the rational thought that we naturally assume that we can postulate theological ideas. Those ideas which are demonstrably false as you've outlined: we've dismissed. I fail to see your objection.If supernatural does not sit well with you, Please pick another word, or dismiss the thought all together as it is not important to me what its called.
...
On what grounds is anyone able to assert claim of a God and then stamp it as rational?
If it is rational, then you must have some example grounded in verifiable experience/reality that you draw your inference from...right? If it is to be rational?
