Definition of and evidence for the holocaust

[Aractus]

You guys are all idiots. You're arguing with someone who, essentially, believes that the moon landings were a hoax and a conspiracy and therefore all the "evidence" is really the work of those behind the conspiracy!

It appears all the holohuggers are liars now that you have chimed in with that invention.

Denying the moon landing is to deny an historical event - not just the details of said event, I can't think of a more suitable comparison to your opinion on the holocaust.

For there to be a genuine chance of there being a conspiracy you have to bring evidence that one exists. You have to show that it is possible that a conspiracy may exist, and you have to be able to show that the evidence does not fit the official version of events.

And you also know not one single holohugger here has presented the least description of the official version so again you lie.

Ah, you didn't understand what I said. Such a shame. All I did was explain the basic fact of context. Do we know about the history in the region at the time of the event and prior to that event? Yes we do. We know about WWI history, we know about German politics in the 20's and 30's, and we know about Nazi policies and their history. We also know about antisemitism - which goes all the way back to at least the middle ages in Britain. But we also know about the prejudice against Jews at the time of Nazi Germany too.

So don't pretend like history is about one single thing, one single strand - it isn't. It involves politics, economics, propaganda, science, morale, depressions, language, religions, military, all kinds of things and all sorts of historians specialize in particular fields and studying history from a particular angle. And some are lousy historians, sure, but many are excellent historians who do field work and collect data to fill in the gaps from the research others have done and build upon the larger picture by contributing their piece of the jigsaw puzzle.

So your only response is a string of lies. Again it appears all holohuggers are liars. One reasonably assumes from that that everything they present is also lies. No conspiracy just a bunch of unmitigated liars peddling nothing they know anything about. Might as well be selling snake oil.

Response to what? I'm not interested in having a discussion with you over the validity of the evidence for the Holocaust. You're way off in lala land I'm afraid, and are incapable of absorbing the truth.