Intelligent Design, Proof IV

[Esquilax]

It is called Empirical evidence

Yes, so where's yours? You're the one making the assertion of something additional, after all.

Go educate yourself for a bit for "No" god sake!

What's your educational basis for saying these things?

I based a proposition based on almost every example we see in life
still you are rejecting it based on nothing.

You pointed at a bunch of stuff and asserted that since you can't imagine how it might have come about, it must be god. That's not evidence, that's an argument from ignorance.

I think you are a true evidence for non-intelligent evolution and mutation.

And I think you were dropped on your head as a baby. The difference is, I've got your posting record as evidence of your mental deficiency, and the reverse is untrue.

Evolution is not a fact as it is not proved, they have only some clues and observation that may be explained by evolution.

So, when I give crystal clear examples of evolution, like the different breeds of dog, the silver fox experiments that yielded drastic changes, and the lab-sterile observations of evolution in bacteria and fruit flies, you're just dead set on ignoring it all?

I never saw a scientific article that call evolution a fact, usually they use the term "Theory".

Hey cool: you've just demonstrated you have no idea about the basics of science let alone evolution. Keep showing off that magnificent idiocy, "Scholar." Here, educate yourself, you schmuck.

Because most people are not familiar with Abiogenesis, however most evolutionists believe in non-intelligent evolution so they are obligated to believe in Abiogenesis as well.

Are we, fuckwit?