(June 5, 2013 at 8:44 am)Godschild Wrote: Reading and sensible discernment are two totally different things.
Apologists don't practice "sensible discernment". They practice "confirmation bias" to fit the beliefs they already have. The same post hoc reading of verses comes into play with so-called "prophecies" but I'll get to that pile next...
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
