RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 5, 2013 at 11:29 am
(This post was last modified: June 5, 2013 at 11:35 am by Brian37.)
(June 4, 2013 at 10:52 pm)k2490 Wrote:
I saw this same image on my facebook news feed posted by someone that I hardly talk to now.
this just seems too backwards for words.
anyone have any comments on this?
Yes, if these morons would not say "Oh this Muslim claims the Koran matches science, so Allah must be the one true god". They are idiots to think the bible is a science textbook.
They think other religions don't try the same bullshit?
Gravity is not Hindu based. Etropy is not Wicca based. And Thor does not make lightening either. Otherwise if Posiden makes hurricanes because we can prove the sky and ocean are real.
Elaborate tripe still has the stench of ignorance no matter how much you try to retrofit science to it.
It doesn't work when any religion does it.
(June 5, 2013 at 11:26 am)DeistPaladin Wrote:(June 5, 2013 at 8:44 am)Godschild Wrote: Reading and sensible discernment are two totally different things.
Apologists don't practice "sensible discernment". They practice "confirmation bias" to fit the beliefs they already have. The same post hoc reading of verses comes into play with so-called "prophecies" but I'll get to that pile next...
They don't research, like method demands, they "research" like a fiction writer, they look for things to not only confirm their fantasy and twist it to falsely make it fit, they also use it as a marketing tool.
Planes fly regardless of the religions of the passengers or pilot. Computers work regardless of the religion of the users. Science is only dependent on questioning and testing and good quality control.
"Apologist" is simply an ancient word for marketing. Science has never been based on marketing, gravity is true regardless of who jumps off that building.
Humans merely do not want to face the fact that god/s are merely the product of our species wishful thinking and selfish narcissism.