(June 6, 2013 at 5:43 am)fr0d0 Wrote: So which is it to be? Does science cover the physical only or also the metaphysical? You don't get to redefine god. Which is a shame because without that idea you'd be home dry. Damn reality for getting in the way huh!
Which god? The distant, metaphysical deepity you're claiming him to be now that it's convenient, or the miracle weaving sky daddy your bible depicts him as?
Quote:As you're joining with the extraordinary claims, please explain how good should be explainable by science. All you have to do is provide a logically justifiable example. if what you claim is true, this should be a very simple exercise. I look forward to your answer.
Okay: does your god interact with reality in any way? Performs miracles? Heals the sick? Created the universe? Then congratulations! You've now made a claim testable by science.
Does he not do any of those things? No interaction with the universe at all? Then why should I or anyone else care whether he exists or not?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
