RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 6, 2013 at 7:46 am
(This post was last modified: June 6, 2013 at 7:56 am by fr0d0.)
(June 6, 2013 at 5:52 am)cato123 Wrote:(June 6, 2013 at 5:43 am)fr0d0 Wrote: All you have to do is provide a logically justifiable example. if what you claim is true, this should be a very simple exercise. I look forward to your answer.
These requirements, yet you are still incapable of providing the same for your creator of the universe. Funny how that works.
Seriously? There's a wealth of philosophical information on the subject. I can and do support my own reasoning extensively.
What I don't do though, is try to support scientific claims with metaphysical theory, and neither do I try to support metaphysical theory with science, as I see huge contradiction there. The guys here seem to disagree, and I'm trying to get them to logically justify their stance so that I can challenge myself there. I think it's a lost cause though.
(June 6, 2013 at 5:58 am)Esquilax Wrote:(June 6, 2013 at 5:43 am)fr0d0 Wrote: So which is it to be? Does science cover the physical only or also the metaphysical? You don't get to redefine god. Which is a shame because without that idea you'd be home dry. Damn reality for getting in the way huh!
Which god? The distant, metaphysical deepity you're claiming him to be now that it's convenient, or the miracle weaving sky daddy your bible depicts him as?
The Christian God who is both metaphysical and who interacts with this reality. You've just heaped another claim onto your pile. How do you think that these physical manifistations should be proven? The bible is clear that they cannot be independently verifiable. indeed, Christianity would crumble to dust right now if you could substantiate this one. I think you could be on the brink of becoming very rich! Remember me won't you!
