Yes but France were flirting with the idea of withdrawing, not with war, which is obviously typical of the French. And also, Russia only attacked because they received a formal declaration of war. The Germans had no reason to do what they did and they rightfully paid the price. And comparing the US-Iraq war with Germany, really? C'mon now, at least France had some ability to strike back, whereas Iraq posed absolutely no threat, they could barely extract oil from their own fields and yet somehow Bush labelled them a National Security risk, and the lovely Blair went in front of us and told us with a straight face that Saddam had chemical weapons that could reach the UK within 45 minutes!
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 7, 2025, 8:34 am
Thread Rating:
Science confirms the Bible?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? | Whateverist | 143 | 55855 |
March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am Last Post: Gwaithmir |
|
How does "Science prove that the miracles of the Bible did not happen" ? | Emzap | 62 | 15577 |
November 4, 2016 at 2:05 am Last Post: dyresand |
|
Illinois bible colleges: "We shouldn't have to follow state standards because bible!" | Esquilax | 34 | 9329 |
January 23, 2015 at 12:29 pm Last Post: Spooky |
|
Trust the Bible not Science | Dolorian | 34 | 9757 |
October 25, 2014 at 10:09 pm Last Post: Neo-Scholastic |
|
Does science prove or disprove the bible | Justtristo | 8 | 10012 |
October 19, 2011 at 1:31 pm Last Post: Simon Moon |
|
Whose facts are more out of whack Science OR the Bible? | Castle | 43 | 17656 |
July 12, 2011 at 12:20 am Last Post: Castle |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)