RE: Science confirms the Bible?
June 10, 2013 at 2:44 am
(This post was last modified: June 10, 2013 at 2:59 am by fr0d0.)
(June 9, 2013 at 8:30 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(June 9, 2013 at 7:50 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Please state how then Rhythm. You know how we hate people talking out of their assess around here.
Both are based in vaporous nothing. He's waiting for science to catch up because he has jack shit - you insist that it just must be "purpose" because -you- have jack shit. Both of you wish to excuse the text (clearly you both realize that it needs excusing) - and both of you plan to do so via the same mechanism...bare assertion of ridiculous garbage.
Clear enough?
Got it thanks. You ignore the evidence. Ironic huh?
(June 9, 2013 at 8:51 pm)Walking Void Wrote: By the way if You noticed the "false" context of my last comment it means people can disprove a truth.
Did I take a stance and support objective truth or did I not comment on that? I did not comment on that. Things are known to be true until shown otherwise. Political mechanisms are not a tool, yours is to put words in my mouth.
Captain obvious yet you complain I didn't spell it or enough for you. Yes, true or false. Both are absolutes and science specifically doesn't deal in absolutes.
Nothing is known to be true in science. You're always making an assumption.
I'm not putting words into your mouth. I'm correcting your false assumptions.
In 2000 years people will be laughing at your assumptions, and be declaring you ignorant of the "truth".
(June 10, 2013 at 2:10 am)littleendian Wrote: which btw have no proof either, they're merely axioms that don't even make sense.
Kudos apart from this line. They don't have empirical proofs, but they do have proofs which do make sense.... if we're going to keep on the side of truth
