Apologies if this has been addressed, I've been offline a while for personal reasons and haven't been able to keep up properly
No I am not saying that and I don't appreciate words being put into my mouse. I find it patronising and rude and the condescendingly triumphant punctuation doesn't exacty help. Please don't do these things again. I'm simply calling bullshit on your conspiracy theory. Science is a tool for understanding reality and thus follows the evidence. Should that evidence lead to a god or entity of similar distinction, that then becomes a part of reality and can be quantified. In other words, science doesn't - or shouldn't - care whether there is a god or not. Such things prejudge the conclusions and just basically get in the way. There's a reason the Church-dominated era is called the Dark Age.
(June 6, 2013 at 12:30 am)Drich Wrote:(June 5, 2013 at 2:21 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Bullshit.
So, your saying science is use to prove the existence of God?!? Do you have any supporting documentation?
No I am not saying that and I don't appreciate words being put into my mouse. I find it patronising and rude and the condescendingly triumphant punctuation doesn't exacty help. Please don't do these things again. I'm simply calling bullshit on your conspiracy theory. Science is a tool for understanding reality and thus follows the evidence. Should that evidence lead to a god or entity of similar distinction, that then becomes a part of reality and can be quantified. In other words, science doesn't - or shouldn't - care whether there is a god or not. Such things prejudge the conclusions and just basically get in the way. There's a reason the Church-dominated era is called the Dark Age.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
