(June 13, 2013 at 8:43 am)Rationalman Wrote: I don't get what you are trying to say. Is just that the dinosaur exhibits in the smithsonian are not 100% made of actual fossilised bone? Or that this is somehow evidence that dinosaurs are made up?
I am saying the pictures you guys are using as proof of dinosaurs are artist renditions of what is actually found.
Truth be known most of the bone remains are peiced together. Like Dig A in Africa will yield an upper body of Dinosaur X, and Dig B in North America will turn up the lower half of Dinosaur Xa (Meaning a close relitive because the bones look like the would lign up, but another variable like the ablity to date a given fossile puts it in a different time period. Which is one of the resaons I do not agree with time stamp placed on the fossil record.) So these two halves are reproduced my sculptors and various experts (because even in the best situations the bones are cracked and or splintered and can not be completely seperated from the substraight, or some bones are out right missing, and someone simply fills in the gaps.) Then the reproductions are made into molds and Craftsmen put the various peices together on wire frames and the are placed in museums where (appearently) Some "published Geologists" and the general atheist public mistake these resin copies as being once living momuments that God could not have ever existed.
To which I ask why? Even if the time frame 'science' wants to use is correct. The bible does not age itself.
