RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
June 14, 2013 at 3:20 am
(This post was last modified: June 14, 2013 at 3:21 am by Alter2Ego.)
(May 22, 2013 at 9:57 am)Tonus Wrote:ALTER2EGO -to- TONUS:(May 21, 2013 at 11:22 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: ALTER2EGO -to- MISTER AGENDA:The expression "could have" amounts to speculation aka personal opinion.
That's not his point. The lack of a verified scientific theory regarding the origins of life has no bearing on the validity of the theory of evolution, for which there is ample evidence. He isn't speculating that god may have dipped his finger into the primal soup and conjured up a few single-celled organisms. He's pointing out that even if this was the case, it doesn't invalidate our understanding of why life is so diverse.
You are confused. You admitted there is lack of evidence to support evolution theory. And that's theory as in: "A group of hypotheses that can be disproven." Then you turn around and contradict yourself in the same paragraph by making the unsubstantiated claim that there is "ample evidence" for evolution theory. What "ample evidence" are you referring to? According to the fossils record, evolution did not occur.
