RE: Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth
June 14, 2013 at 3:24 am
(This post was last modified: June 14, 2013 at 3:32 am by Esquilax.)
Quote:Why? Because you say so? As I previously stated, the scientific consensus a few centuries ago was that earth is the center of the universe. It turns out that that was dead wrong. Rather than being the center of the universe, earth revolves around the sun.
No: because over a century of science says so. You know, that "the earth was once thought to be X, therefore science can't be trusted" argument is so flawed; once we had the ability to test it it became pretty quickly clear that a flat earth, or a geocentric universe, or whatever else was untenable.
But when we gained the ability to test evolution, multiple times over since we've developed genetic, geological and observational tests since the inception of the theory, evolution only becomes a more clear fact. We keep running tests... and those tests keep confirming that evolution is true.
The two examples aren't even apples and oranges; a geocentric universe (which is still what the bible thinks it is, by the way) was a concept based on the only information we had at the time. We didn't have the ability to test it. And when we did, it fell by the wayside.
But we've had the ability to test evolution every which way for decades, and there hasn't been a single shred of evidence against it that stands up to testing. There's a difference between a geocentrism- a concept from before scientific standards that existed before the methodology to test it- and evolution- a concept that has weathered many years of having the methodology and technology to test it without doubt.
Quote:You are confused. You admitted there is lack of evidence to support evolution theory. And that's theory as in: "A group of hypotheses that can be disproven." Then you turn around and contradict yourself in the same paragraph by making the unsubstantiated claim that there is "ample evidence" for evolution theory. What "ample evidence" are you referring to? According to the fossils record, evolution did not occur.
Oh, you mean this fossil record? Perhaps you're talking about this observed example of evolution? Or this laboratory experiment with confirmed volutionary results? Or this?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!