RE: Why Secular Morality is Superior
June 17, 2013 at 3:36 pm
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2013 at 3:41 pm by fr0d0.)
(June 17, 2013 at 10:23 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: Frodo, your post is so disconnected with our exchange I'm not sure where to begin exactly or how to even make sense of it.
For example, "we" haven't "established" any flawed nature of secular morality. You can't "reason" any god, much less your own (even as a deist, I confess that my concepts of God are instinctive and not rational). We've been all over why honest mistakes are not matters of morality, a point I can't seem to communicate successfully to you. The Bible DOES say that Yahweh got some things wrong (specifically, in Genesis where he "repents" of creating humans just before the flood and then kind of repents after the flood where he promises never to do it again).
I'm addressing your points directly but you don't get it. Yet again with the ad Homs.
You haven't attempted to challenge the flaws pointed out in secular morality. These points are irrefutable. You cannot of course.
You don't speak to me with your imaginary beliefs. My beliefs are entirely logically based. Must I really keep saying to you that there cannot be proof either way. This is what constitutes Christian belief through faith.
The bible DOESN'T say that God got things wrong. Your warped interpretation does. Please be accurate in your language.
Suffice to say, you have provided zero in the way if criticism of the Christian position on Divine morality. Indeed Christians don't recognise anything you've said to bear any relation to Christianity. This seems consistent with all I've read you say on the subject.
I know you don't want to confront it. But challenges to your suggestions are successful if you don't manage to refute anything.