RE: Richard Dawkins obliterates the 10 Commandments.
June 19, 2013 at 1:37 am
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2013 at 1:38 am by Mystical.)
Well I did pick it out myself... 
I've gotten quite a good run of holy hand grenade jokes, so, that's something.
I like bunnies. Oh and skulls, I love ripping peoples jugulars out with my big pointy teeth. I'm assuming you're referring to that.
Second to be unanswered question: what if that bunny is just doing what god told it to? Then it would be a holy moral bunny!
I've gotten quite a good run of holy hand grenade jokes, so, that's something.
I like bunnies. Oh and skulls, I love ripping peoples jugulars out with my big pointy teeth. I'm assuming you're referring to that.
Second to be unanswered question: what if that bunny is just doing what god told it to? Then it would be a holy moral bunny!
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
