(June 9, 2013 at 7:48 am)Esquilax Wrote: Microevolution, huh? Well, thanks: we didn't need any more proof that you don't understand evolution at all, but it's good that you keep mounting it up anyway. Of course evolution happens within the species; a dog will always give birth to a dog, but those changes within species accumulate over time, and given that we're talking about millions of years, eventually those changes accumulate to the point that we'd need to start calling the eventual organism a new species.As it impossible for us to repeat the process (of changing a species to another), then it is not a fact it is just a theory
Let me put it this way: if you take one step, and then another step, and then keep taking steps, eventually you'll walk a mile, right? Your image of this is that you keep taking step after step but you'll never walk a mile at all. It's dumb.
Quote:Your claims is that a single life, self replicating molecules can be the start, which is impoosible and doesn't exist.Quote:A Virus is not a single moleculeIt is a series of molecules though... that replicate. Why do you need to keep dishonestly shifting the goalposts, rather than just admitting you're wrong?
Quote:Which conforms to my point of the impossibility for life to begin with a random event.Quote:A DNA is not able to live by itselfIt was never alive to begin with. And that wasn't what you asked for anyway.
DNA doesn't replicate by itself, even from the link that you gave (Liar)