RE: Why Secular Morality is Superior
June 19, 2013 at 1:59 pm
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2013 at 1:59 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(June 19, 2013 at 1:35 pm)John V Wrote: Yes, you need to explain the cutoff. Sentience does not necessarily imply feelings or self-awareness. Focus like a laser, man!
Really?
Dictionary.com: Sentience
Quote:noun
sentient condition or character; capacity for sensation or feeling.
— n
1. the state or quality of being sentient; awareness
2. sense perception not involving intelligence or mental perception; feeling
Merriam Webster: Sentient
Quote:1 : responsive to or conscious of sense impressions <sentient beings>
2: aware
3: finely sensitive in perception or feeling
You lose. Try again?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
