(June 20, 2013 at 2:01 am)fr0d0 Wrote: #1 is a dishonest over simplification. You omit the fact that God would judge the whole life of the child and it's potential descendants. Only God can know if that future is innocent or guilty, and is the only one who can exact justice. Once more, how are you judging God? What knowledge do you possess and how? If you cannot know, how are you making these claims?
Is it a crime in the eyes of God to birth descendants who commit crimes? Is it just to condemn someone for a crime they might commit in the future? Weren't you the one just telling me that Calvinism is an incorrect interpretation of Christianity? If God is willing to kill someone for crimes uncommitted, then the idea of free will is fraudulent.
Not only that, there's no consistency with this interpretation. Why did God spare everyone else in the world who might commit offenses against him, or produce descendants who would? The world has never been short of people who don't follow God's commandments. Why did God decide not to destroy the individual perpetrators? Why did he not decide to kill their ancestors? He didn't do either of these things. That is the knowledge I possess. Inconsistent justice is an oxymoron.
Quote:#2 "crime" is a word you added and yet there is no evidence of a crime being committed. People we're killed. God served justice. Please show your proof that these people we're innocent.
Guilty until proven innocent? Show your proof that these people were guilty of any offense against the God who destroyed them. I want you to demonstrate to me what crime a baby at the breast could possibly commit. I want you to explain to me (and how many times have I asked now? Three?) precisely how you would justify slaughtering every person in a nation.
