Why Secular Morality is Superior

[John V]

Not sure what the tiger blood is a reference to but when you lose an argument, there's always appeals to ridicule, it would seem.

Charlie Sheen's meltdown. He was always claiming "winning" when he obviously wasn't, so of course you remind me of him.

As already noted: the distinctions between religious and civil aspects of religious morality are clear and don’t cause confusion; and, secular morality also has victimless offenses such as public nudity.

Still waiting for you to justify the increased and confusing complexity that religious-based morality dumps on top of the issues of secular morality. No more red herring evasion for you. Your options are:
1. Answer the challenge or
2. Concede point #1

Special pleading.

You and Frodo love to bandy around terms that describe logical fallacies but don't seem to understand what they mean.
[/quote]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_pleading
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies...ading.html