RE: Why Secular Morality is Superior
June 20, 2013 at 3:24 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2013 at 3:31 pm by fr0d0.)
(June 20, 2013 at 3:18 am)Esquilax Wrote:(June 20, 2013 at 1:40 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Please demonstrate how that is so.
At the moment that you begin defending genocide you have clearly demonstrated that you have no morality at all
That's not an answer. Don't fly off on one until you've succeeded In proving a point. So far we have bare assertion to hang me with.
But of course if you make a big enough smoke screen you inadequacy might be obscured. Your deliberate misreading of the text might be forgotten.
Guess what? I still need evidence. Don't be shy.
Innocent babies: I've been through this before this week. God, having the ability to judge future action, can judge you on what you will do.
No one can judge: precisely the point. What we have is a definite statement or two. All of those statements are consistent in reporting a just God exercising justice.
This is what we have to deal with.
If you want to disprove the statements, you have you show how those statements are incorrect. That burden is yours to shoulder.
If you make that claim without substantiating it, we can all happily move on and disregard your claim.
Likewise, If I we're to make a claim that the statements could be proven, I would expect you to demand that my claim be backed up. Do you see me making any claims? No.
So here we are again, waiting for these inspired claims to be substantiated. Meanwhile, we must assume their falsity.
(June 20, 2013 at 3:30 am)Ryantology Wrote: Weren't you the one just telling me that Calvinism is an incorrect interpretation of Christianity? If God is willing to kill someone for crimes uncommitted, then the idea of free will is fraudulent.
Not me my friend.
There is no such thing as free will, only free agency.
Once more with your claims of supernatural abilities. Please tell us how you know if it's just to circumvent a life justly, and let another play out unjustly. I guess you can't tell us because then we'd know as much as you do and your claims wouldn't sounds so absurd.