RE: If you believe in the God of the Bible, why try to prove it logically?
June 21, 2013 at 7:39 pm
(This post was last modified: June 21, 2013 at 7:43 pm by fr0d0.)
@ pineapple
You didn't give your dog another toy. The toy came from another person (/god).
Regardless... the toy represents a gift of love. It's the dogs choice to accept it or not. If he rebels and refuses your toy, he chooses to rebel against good. (sorry I see how I mixed that up a bit)
Rebellion against good is bad. There is only good. There are not several (fully) goods. You can't bypass the choice to be good with an alternative good, or your original good can't have been good at all. (talking about ultimate goods, as God supposedly is)
I'm sure that you think that there's reason to be good. If we took out the dogma and talked about this minus all of the religious baggage, I wonder if we'd have much disagreement.
Personally I think anyone is evil for not choosing vanilla
You didn't give your dog another toy. The toy came from another person (/god).
Regardless... the toy represents a gift of love. It's the dogs choice to accept it or not. If he rebels and refuses your toy, he chooses to rebel against good. (sorry I see how I mixed that up a bit)
Rebellion against good is bad. There is only good. There are not several (fully) goods. You can't bypass the choice to be good with an alternative good, or your original good can't have been good at all. (talking about ultimate goods, as God supposedly is)
I'm sure that you think that there's reason to be good. If we took out the dogma and talked about this minus all of the religious baggage, I wonder if we'd have much disagreement.
Personally I think anyone is evil for not choosing vanilla
