Esquilax Wrote:Why did he let Hitler live- not to Godwin- given the damage he would inflict on god's chosen people?
That's actually a very good question. Why did he not destroy Hitler--and massacre every single person in Germany--in retaliation for attempting to annihilate his chosen people, when that is precisely the crime for which he commanded the massacre of every Amalekite, only about a billion times worse? A
If your response is "that happened after Christ died for our sins", why did he not kill Hitler's distant ancestor B.C. (or, given God's tendencies, massacre everybody within a hundred mile radius of wherever Hitler's B.C. ancestor happened to live) with the justification that it would prevent one of the world's most heinous evils?
It's not justice. It's a murderous tyrant's whimsy.
