Here is an interesting fact about the intelligent design movement in the US.
One of the argument proponents of ID make in favor of bringing their pseudo-science into the classroom to be taught alongside evolution is two-model education stimulates students. While this is undoubtedly true when properly applied it is an educational model that ID proponents only want to see applied to the evolution versus ID in public schools. It is an educational model they don’t use in Christian parochial schools. In fact they claim it is an inferior means of education when used to provide alternatives their views. While they demand that ID be given equal time in public schools, they argue against equal time for evolution in the private schools they control. It is so bad that when Christian Heritage College was evaluated for accreditation by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges the evaluation team found that the school practiced indoctrination not education.
One of the argument proponents of ID make in favor of bringing their pseudo-science into the classroom to be taught alongside evolution is two-model education stimulates students. While this is undoubtedly true when properly applied it is an educational model that ID proponents only want to see applied to the evolution versus ID in public schools. It is an educational model they don’t use in Christian parochial schools. In fact they claim it is an inferior means of education when used to provide alternatives their views. While they demand that ID be given equal time in public schools, they argue against equal time for evolution in the private schools they control. It is so bad that when Christian Heritage College was evaluated for accreditation by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges the evaluation team found that the school practiced indoctrination not education.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
![[Image: JUkLw58.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/JUkLw58.gif)