(June 23, 2013 at 7:01 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:(June 23, 2013 at 6:08 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: Wait a minute, at Post 118, I was correcting Esquilax who told me that evolution is a fact. But I get the privilege of being referred to as a "maroon"? Interesting.
It is kind of hard to correct someone on an issue when you are wrong and they are right. Frankly your stance on this particular issue has gone beyond the realm of humor and entered that of the macabre. You don't understand that the meaning of the words theory and fact are dependent upon context when talking about evolution. Neither are you interested in learning why you are wrong because doing so would conflict with your dumb ass dogma. However your refusal to accept reality does not change the fact that evolution is both theory and fact.
ALTER2EGO -to- POPEYES PAPPY:
You gave me a weblink to support your assertion that evolution is not merely theory, it is also fact. Esquilax also informed me that evolution is fact. When I corrected Esquilax, I was informed at Post 126 by one of the moderators that I am a "maroon." Below is that conversation:
(June 23, 2013 at 8:47 am)Stimbo Wrote:(June 22, 2013 at 7:32 pm)Alter2Ego Wrote: FYI: There is no such thing as "evolution fact." There is only evolution theory, and theories are merely attempts at explaining why a phenomena occurred. Or didn't you realize that?
Anyone feel like telling this maroon that theories explain how - not why - phenomena occur, that they are made up of facts and laws, and that no amount of testing will turn a theory into a fact because they are totally different things (it would be like expecting a painting of a sunset to turn into the real landscape)?
Because clearly s/he doesn't reaise that.
@ POPEYES PAPPY:
I suggest you take your argument about evolution being "fact" to Stimbo.
