Genesis Creation vs. Darwin's Macroevolution Myth

[Cyberman]

Unfortunately A2E I am forced by your posts on this forum to agree with the mod's assessment of you. The only difference is I would add intentionally ignorant before moron.

ALTER2EGO -to- POPEYES PAPPY:
Unfortunately, popeyespappy, when the moderator Stimbo referred to me as a "maroon," it was because Stimbo thought I was the one making the fallacious claim that evolution "theory" is fact. It turns out that Esquilax was the one making that fallacious claim about "theory" being fact and I was merely correcting Esquilax.

Unfortunately, EasterEgo (apologies; bloody autocorrect), when I referred to you as a maroon I was neither posting in my capacity as moderator nor thinking that which you ascribe to me. You don't get to speculate on my thought processes without comment. Read my words again, in context this time. Better yet, have an appropriate adult read them to you. Either way, quit cherry picking people's words to prop up your own sad points.

Did you see why Stimbo used to word "maroon"? It was directed at the person who argued that evolution "theory" is fact, and Stimbo thought I was the one arguing it. As you can see, I was arguing against evolution theory being fact.

Do you see why I called you a maroon? You are the one deliberately conflating the biological, observable fact of evolution with the theory of evolution which describes how that fact works. I was pointing out that they are two very different things and only extreme dishonesty or pathological idiocy cannot recognise that after it's been pointed out numerous times. Which is it in this case?

Now you have also made the same fallacious claim about "theory" being "fact." According to Stimbo, a person who thinks "theory" is fact is a "maroon". You follow my drift?

With reference to my previous paragraph, if you are confusing theory with fact after repeatedly being corrected, you are getting off lightly with "maroon". You follow my drift?