"In theory" you can buy a car but it does you no good not to have gas in it. While it does not gut the "oversight" part of the law, it does deem the oversight location institutions unconstitutional. So basically you are removing the gas from the car, which makes it literally open season on voting rights.
Or like Minimalist said "fuck a super model and then cut your balls off".
5-4 has been a relatively constant split over the past couple of decades especially on social issues. But to claim that the majority was "fair" about it is bullshit, the truth of this reversal on 40 years of law is told by minority judge in Ruth Ginsburg who called the decision "demolition".
So claiming it was split and fair would be like saying "Yea we left the building mostly in tact, but we weakened the main pillars"
Or like Minimalist said "fuck a super model and then cut your balls off".
5-4 has been a relatively constant split over the past couple of decades especially on social issues. But to claim that the majority was "fair" about it is bullshit, the truth of this reversal on 40 years of law is told by minority judge in Ruth Ginsburg who called the decision "demolition".
So claiming it was split and fair would be like saying "Yea we left the building mostly in tact, but we weakened the main pillars"