I probably should have used a better term than humanity.
Interesting though, how that small minority of individuals who hold most of the worlds money are somehow the object of scorn when we consider how much poverty could be removed by a single one of them.
Maybe my argument should have been about the resemblance between the two arguments because both arguments have a strong and stubborn side to them. Strong are science and the rich; stubborn would be the religious and the poor.
Poor being the underlying factor in both circumstances because religion is designed to favor oppressed people, ie, "the meek shall inherit the earth" - nonsense!
Interesting though, how that small minority of individuals who hold most of the worlds money are somehow the object of scorn when we consider how much poverty could be removed by a single one of them.
Maybe my argument should have been about the resemblance between the two arguments because both arguments have a strong and stubborn side to them. Strong are science and the rich; stubborn would be the religious and the poor.
Poor being the underlying factor in both circumstances because religion is designed to favor oppressed people, ie, "the meek shall inherit the earth" - nonsense!
Coming soon: Banner image-link to new anti-islam forum.
